Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jeanie Jenks's avatar

Did you mean Tom to say William let it be known that he did want to reduce pomp & ceremony? With a stripped down working royal team this is probably necessary. Some of the aristocracy will probably be disgruntled - remember the outcry at Charles' coronation? The outcry stemmed from the decision to drastically reduce the number of hereditary peers invited & to limit the traditional pageantry, including the wearing of tiaras.

William definitely presents a more democratic (not meant in the political sense but in the general sense of being "of the people") than his predecessor Monarchs. And also tons more sincere (beyond even considering the commercialization context that Harry chose to pursue & who has then become like a paid talking head) than Harry when speaking about mental health & more relevant. William is also better educated & more intelligent.

I feel that William intends to break from the "ostriching" (avoiding uncomfortable, but necessary, conversations) of the past, signaling a more open, "here & now" approach to the monarchy & most importantly transparent. Which given the York scandal i hope means no coverup of Royal misbehaviors & shady dealings - in fact, encouraging this open & credible approach from the outset discourages this kind of behavior from the get-go.

IvyB's avatar

Very well put Tom. Both W & H have had their share of emotional hardship, losing their mother at a very young age & being left with an emotionally absent father. The difference being William always makes it about other people, Harry always makes it about himself or Meghan.

108 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?